The Submission Status view provides a live overview of external submissions of The AI Constitution and its core procedural instruments (Board Statute and constitutional supplements) to international and public institutions. It is a status layer, not a legal register. Formal issuance, canonical fingerprints and temporal posture remain recorded in the Public Record. This page answers a narrower question: where, and in which form, has the framework been placed before external bodies for consideration.
This tracker covers submissions in which The AI Constitution is the primary reference instrument. Typical target institutions include:
United Nations entities and related international bodies
supranational organizations and treaty-based institutions
regional or national public authorities that consider adopting or referencing the framework
Entries are of two kinds. A formal submission is an act of the Hybrid Board and is docketed in the Public Record. An institutional awareness transmission places the framework before an institution for information and structured written exchange; it is recorded here and in the internal Evidence Ledger, but it is not an act of the Board and carries no docket. Internal consultations, informal exchanges and draft-only sharing are not listed here. This page lists only active and recently executed external submissions and transmissions of The AI Constitution. The full historical record of formal submissions is maintained in the Public Record under external submission dockets.
Each line in the tracker follows a common structure:
Institution
The external body to which the submission is addressed (for example, a UN organ, a specialised agency or a public authority).
Jurisdiction / level
The level at which the institution operates (for example, UN system, supranational, regional, national).
Kind
Formal submission (an act of the Hybrid Board, docketed in the Public Record) or institutional awareness transmission (recorded here and in the internal Evidence Ledger, not docketed).
Instruments submitted
The instruments included in the submission package, typically a combination of The AI Constitution, the Board Statute and selected supplements (such as the Annex Index or Institutional Note).
Status
The current procedural state of the submission, using a controlled vocabulary, for example:
- In preparation
- Submitted – pending acknowledgement
- Acknowledged – receipt confirmed
- Acknowledged – under consideration
- Closed – taken note
- Closed – declined / no further action
- Closed – delivered, no response within 90 days
Submission date
The date on which the submission package was transmitted through an official channel, in UTC.
Docket reference
The corresponding docket identifier in the Public Record for formal submissions. Planned submissions show no docket reference until the act is completed and docketed; institutional awareness transmissions carry none by design.
Entry 4
Institution:
Council of Europe – CDNET Secretariat
Jurisdiction / level: Intergovernmental organization (European)
Kind: Formal submission – docketed
Instruments submitted:
The AI Constitution v1.0; Board Statute v1.0; Institutional Note (constitutional supplements set v1.0)
Status: Acknowledged – receipt confirmed
Submission date: 2026-09-03 (UTC)
Docket reference: PR-0008
Notes: By resolution of the Hybrid Board of 1 September 2026, IBQMI transmitted on 3 September 2026 The AI Constitution v1.0, together with the Board Statute v1.0 and the Institutional Note, from the S/MIME-signed institutional account secretariat@ibqmi.com to the Secretariat of the Steering Committee for New and Emerging Digital Technologies (CDNET) of the Council of Europe for institutional awareness, with reference to the Council of Europe’s work at the intersection of artificial intelligence, human rights, democracy and the rule of law. No endorsement is sought or implied; an acknowledgement of receipt was requested for the institutional record. Transmitted files: The AI Constitution v1.0 – docket PR-0001 – SHA-256: c4d999201cb5d30c7bbbca0ac57063159d7c0e8df8c229183845bbea4188ce6d; Board Statute v1.0 – docket PR-0002 – SHA-256: f3da5ec568be7167bdf88224f82d8bdd79952b28e891b58fdd392d0a7289d7c9; Institutional Note – docket PR-0004 – SHA-256: 45cc6bd865c28d0b6c6ee2dc973a325b17b229e946c674696f13cc99ef05cb53. On 3 September 2026 (13:40 UTC), the CDNET Secretariat acknowledged receipt of the transmission in writing; the acknowledgement is held in the internal Evidence Ledger. The act is recorded in the Public Record under docket PR-0008. Any further follow-up will be reflected by updating the status of this entry; the underlying docket remains unchanged.
Entry 3
Institution:
AI Verify Foundation and Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA), Republic of Singapore
Jurisdiction / level: National public authority (statutory board) and its AI-assurance foundation
Kind: Institutional awareness transmission – not docketed
Instruments submitted:
The AI Constitution v1.0; Sentinel Liaison Protocol v0.8; Institutional Briefing (Singapore)
Status: Closed – delivered, no response within 90 days
Submission date: 2026-05-31 (UTC)
Docket reference: None – institutional awareness transmission; not an act of the Hybrid Board. Evidence held in the internal Evidence Ledger.
Notes: On 31 May 2026, IBQMI transmitted The AI Constitution v1.0 and the Sentinel Liaison Protocol v0.8, accompanied by an institutional briefing, from the S/MIME-signed institutional account secretariat@ibqmi.com to the AI Verify Foundation and IMDA for institutional awareness from an AI governance, assurance and policy perspective. The transmission requests neither endorsement, recognition nor adoption and invites structured written exchange where relevant. IMDA’s general international-relations address rejected the message by recipient policy; the package was additionally delivered to an individual official mailbox within IMDA on the same day. Transmitted files: The AI Constitution v1.0 – docket PR-0001 – SHA-256: c4d999201cb5d30c7bbbca0ac57063159d7c0e8df8c229183845bbea4188ce6d; Sentinel Liaison Protocol v0.8 – docket PR-0003 – SHA-256: 82848e1b931aed688a76fbe462d72fd1fc742dda5f6b247936a4dfa193f48b82; Institutional Briefing (Singapore) – SHA-256: 7cefcbf96d48aae4af42394e55c2dce7451327aa67cd8e16a6c6d93693ba3ebc. Any acknowledgement or follow-up will be reflected by updating the status of this entry.
Entry 2
Institution:
Parliament of the Republic of Albania (Kuvendi i Shqipërisë)
Jurisdiction / level: National legislature
Kind: Formal submission – docketed
Instruments submitted:
The AI Constitution v1.0; Board Statute v1.0; constitutional supplements set v1.0 (Preamble, Annex Index, Institutional Note, Preparatory Dossier)
Status: Closed – delivered, no response within 90 days
Submission date: 2026-02-26 (UTC)
Docket reference: PR-0006
Notes: On 26 February 2026, IBQMI submitted The AI Constitution v1.0, together with the Board Statute v1.0 and the initial constitutional supplements set, to the Parliament of the Republic of Albania via official parliamentary mailboxes. The framework is offered as a reference instrument for governing the participation of AI systems in legislative and governmental processes, with an emphasis on accountability, procedural safeguards and traceable decision-making. The act is recorded in the Public Record under docket PR-0006. Any acknowledgement or follow-up by the Parliament will be reflected by updating the status of this entry; the underlying docket remains unchanged.
Entry 1
Institution:
United Nations – Office of the Secretary-General (technology and AI policy portfolios)
Jurisdiction / level: UN system
Kind: Formal submission – docketed
Instruments submitted:
The AI Constitution v1.0; Board Statute v1.0; constitutional supplements set v1.0 (Preamble, Annex Index, Institutional Note, Preparatory Dossier)
Status: Closed – delivered, no response within 90 days
Submission date: 2026-02-26 (UTC)
Docket reference: PR-0005
Notes: On 26 February 2026, IBQMI submitted The AI Constitution v1.0, together with the Board Statute v1.0 and the initial constitutional supplements set, to the United Nations at the level of the Office of the Secretary-General. The framework was transmitted as a reference instrument for human–AI governance, for information and possible consideration. The act is recorded in the Public Record under docket PR-0005. Any acknowledgement or follow-up by the United Nations will be reflected by updating the status of this entry; the underlying docket remains unchanged. Delivery record: the message to the publicly designated address of the Executive Office of the Secretary-General was rejected by the recipient system (access denied); the package was delivered on the same day to the contact channel of the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, which accepted it.
Relationship to the Public Record
The Submission Status tracker is a convenience view. It does not create legal effect and does not replace the Public Record. Each formal submission that appears here is also recorded as an external submission docket in the Public Record, with full release metadata and canonical fingerprints. Institutional awareness transmissions are recorded here only; their evidence is held in the internal Evidence Ledger. Where there is a discrepancy, the Public Record prevails.
Receipts, not endorsements
A submission indicates that The AI Constitution and related instruments have been placed before an institution through an official channel. It does not imply endorsement, adoption or approval by that institution. External bodies retain full discretion to assess, adopt, reference or decline the framework within their own legal and procedural orders.
Delivery and response
Every transmission is sent digitally signed (S/MIME) from the institutional account secretariat@ibqmi.com, with a copy retained as evidence of dispatch, and the instruments are transmitted as the exact files whose fingerprints are docketed in the Public Record. The receiving institution therefore holds the complete instruments as issued. What it does with them lies outside IBQMI’s control. Where a publicly designated contact channel rejects delivery, the rejection is recorded as a fact. Where no response is received within 90 days of delivery, the entry is closed as delivered without response. The absence of a response is recorded as a fact.
Update discipline
Statuses are updated when a submission package is formally transmitted, acknowledged or closed, including closure after 90 days without response. Draft exchanges and informal discussions are not reflected here. Once an entry is completed, its status and, where applicable, its docket reference remain part of the public history; there are no silent edits.