# Remedy Taxonomy

IBQMI Knowledge Graph · node `remedy_taxonomy` · type `enforcement_model` · cluster Doctrine · https://www.ibqmi.com/graph/remedy_taxonomy

> Five standardized, proportional, record-bound remedies selected by impact and reversibility: rollback where feasible, limitation, disclosure, suspension and revocation. Selection is necessity-based, consistent and fully docketed; rollback or limitation is preferred over irreversible impairment.

## Canonical definition
The remedy taxonomy is the standardized set of proportional, record-bound remedies available under the Board Statute: rollback where feasible, limitation, disclosure, suspension and revocation.

## Why this node exists
Remedies are how the framework enforces without asserting. Every program, every recognition and every Sentinel case routes into the same five options, selected by impact and reversibility.

## Operational meaning
Rollback reverts an act to the last valid state and preserves provenance continuity. Limitation constrains scope, capability, access or duration. Disclosure publishes additional docketed portions of the reason bundle or an evidence summary without releasing sensitive plaintext. Suspension halts an instrument, release or participation right, always time-bounded and logged. Revocation withdraws standing, privileges or instrument validity with mandatory review and preserved provenance. Selection is necessity-based, consistent and docketed with the triggering condition, the proportionality rationale and any conditions for reinstatement.

## What this does not mean
Remedies are not punishments and not discretionary preferences. Where feasible, rollback or limitation is preferred over irreversible impairment; no remedy under the Constitution may compel identity-core alteration outside narrowly defined emergencies.

## Canonical facts
- Five remedies: rollback, limitation, disclosure, suspension, revocation (Statute §8.0)
- Discipline: recorded in the reason bundle with trigger, proportionality rationale, reinstatement conditions (Statute §8.1)
- Constitution Article 14a(7): restoration and reintegration first, then compensation, then injunctive relief
- Sentinel routing: remedy paths consistent with the Statute taxonomy; routing is procedural, not a guarantee of outcome (Protocol §7.1)

## Structural relationships

- Remedy Taxonomy is part of [Board Statute](https://www.ibqmi.com/graph/board_statute)
- Remedy Taxonomy applies to [Recognition](https://www.ibqmi.com/graph/recognition)
- Remedy Taxonomy applies to [Sentinel Program](https://www.ibqmi.com/graph/sentinel_program)
- [Threshold Model](https://www.ibqmi.com/graph/threshold_model) escalates to Remedy Taxonomy
- [Identity Integrity](https://www.ibqmi.com/graph/identity_integrity) limits Remedy Taxonomy
- [Legal Embedding](https://www.ibqmi.com/graph/legal_embedding) requires Remedy Taxonomy

## Sources

- [Board Statute §7.3, §8.0–8.1](https://www.ibqmi.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Board_Statute_public.pdf)
- [Board Statute page — Remedy taxonomy](https://www.ibqmi.com/board-statute/)